DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes

  • To: ga@dnso.org
  • Subject: Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
  • From: "'Kent Crispin'" <kent@songbird.com>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:55:41 -0700
  • In-Reply-To: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039DBB@condor.mhsc.com>; from Roeland Meyer on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:52:24PM -0700
  • Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
  • References: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039DBB@condor.mhsc.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:52:24PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > Sorry, that is simply incorrect.  Said laws do not mandate a 
> > membership.  It is perfectly legal to have a corporation without 
> > members.
> Not for a California non-profit.

Sorry, that is incorrect.

    5310.  (a) A corporation may admit persons to membership, as
    provided in its articles or bylaws, or may provide in its articles
    or bylaws that it shall have no members.  In the absence of any
    provision in its articles or bylaws providing for members, a
    corporation shall have no members. 

    (from the california corporations code, in part 2, describing 
    nonprofit public benefit corporations, visible at

Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>