Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 7:17 pm -0800 3/14/01, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:58:36PM -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>> No "inventive interpretation" is necessary. All that is required is to
>> read the letter from NSI.
>
>The letter from NSI is not a contract.

The Crispy-Crockett duo are now in high gear, mirroring each others posts,
and I can tell Dave (at least) is unsure what to do, as his posts are
rapidly lowering in content. One recent one reminded me a bit of Jonathan
Cohen in Santiago, when he stood up after Peter Dengate-Thrush's speech to
the NC (which got a roudy round of applause), and could only manage to
blert out "that was full of inaccuracies and only an opinion" as an attempt
to dampen things down. Thank you Jonathan, but we'll decide for ourselves.

Someone's bosses are starting to panic and have signalled "go for throttle-up".

This is a sign that the rest of us have picked up the correct scent.

Please, everyone respond to the straw poll vote.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html