ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] New TLD Agreements


The UDRP has saved legitimate businessess many, many
millions of dollars in legal fees.  ICANN has justified itself
by this mechanism alone.
Michael McNulty




"William X. Walsh" wrote:

> Hello JandL,
>
> Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 1:59:03 PM, JandL wrote:
>
> > Note Appendix V.  Registries must comply with UDRP.  Choice just
> > went completely out the window and WIPO wins.
>
> Yes, but this was expected, wasn't it?
>
> The UDRP is the single most glaring flaw with ICANN at the moment.  It
> should be completely suspended until it is reformed.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>