Re: FW: CONSENSUS? [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating rule

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>]

Hi.
Somebody has kept the count of these answers?
I know Elisabeth is busy here at ICANN's - maybe we have to wait until 
next week - unless somebody else has the updatec count.
Regards
Roberto




>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ken Stoen [mailto:Ken@orion.pmiw.com] 
>Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:09 PM
>To: Thomas Roessler; owner-ga@dnso.org
>Subject: CONSENSUS? [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating
>rule
>
>
>Hi 
> Let us cut to the chase here.
>Consider this a call to the list.
>
>A: Is there a CONSENSUS on the following issue: 
>
>
>
>1) The newly elected board members should take
>   their seats before the general meeting, not after.
>
>
>2) All non-elected members whose terms have been
>   extended beyond their original time should immediately
>   resign. 
>
>
>Please reply with yes "I agree"  or "I don't agree"
>
>
>Ken
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Thomas
>>Roessler
>>Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:05 AM
>>To: William X. Walsh
>>Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'technizmo'; ga@dnso.org
>>Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating rule
>>
>>
>>On 2000-11-10 05:52:44 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> Participation is the responsibility of the participant.
>>> Registering or not registering your vote is not our
>>> responsibility.
>>
>>While this is true, it won't work on mailing lists in general.  If
>>all you want to do is claim rough consensus, post a message with a
>>clear and visible subject, like:
>>
>>	CONSENSUS?  <topic>
>>
>>and give people two or three days to indicate their possible
>>objections.  Normally, you'll quite quickly see whether or not there
>>are strong objections against claiming consensus.  This can also be
>>documented.
>>
>>While, this way, you won't get strong documentation and clear
>>legitimation like with formal votes, it'll be sufficient in
>>situations where time is insufficient for a vote, and at least a
>>rough result should be produced.
>>
>>-- 
>>Thomas Roessler                         <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>>--
>>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html