RE: [ga] DNSO Review

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Uh ... this means that ICANN considers DNSO irrelevant?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Higgs [mailto:simon@higgs.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 9:53 AM
> To: roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO Review
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> At 05:40 PM 9/15/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> 
> >Conclusion
> >----------
> >
> >There seem to be consensus for a WG to start, addressing at least the
> >point of creating a Constituency for individuals.
> >Other points raised are more controversial, and should be 
> addressed by
> >the Working Group.
> 
> Start a Working Group? To spend time on more useless, time-wasting, 
> non-productive administration issues? To be once again 
> ignored by the Names 
> Council?
> 
> Create the individuals constituency and be done with it.
> 
> ICANN are calling for TLD applications - a function that the DNSO was 
> created to "specialize in" - and the DNSO have no role at all in that.
> 
> What's wrong with this picture?
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Simon
> 
> --
> Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html