ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Harald's comment discussed on the EU list


Hi Dave --

I hear your message -- and it is the same one you've delivered
for two years.

The good news for both of us is that DNSO and the ICANN reviewers
will eventually evaluate the issue of representativeness at a factual level ...

and probably in fine detail.

Regards

>Dennis



Dave Crocker wrote:

> At 07:16 PM 9/6/00 -0400, Dennis Schaefer wrote:
> >The constituency model envisions that constituencies will organize
> >themselves -- and IDNO is in fact an organization of people seeking
> >recognition as a constituency.rue it has been riven by dissent --- but the
> >measure of any constituency is precisely its ability to permit conflicting
> >viewpoints.
>
> The constituency model requires that the organization have some
> representational relevance for the constituency it claims to
> represent.  IDNO does not satisfy this basic requirement.
>
> The matter of IDNO internal difficulties is nothing as simple as "dissent"
> but, rather, sustained management strife and instability, coupled with a
> complete lack of any constructive activities that pertain to the interests
> of the purported constituency.
>
> d/
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>