ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Harald's comment discussed on the EU list


Hello Joop,

Monday, September 04, 2000, 8:56:34 PM, you wrote:

> Such structure will not be cemented by adding a new constituency. If it is 
> fragile by itself it will became even more weak by adding another different 
> voice. If it will collapse by adding the IDNO it will simply mean it was
> wrong 

The IDNO should not be added.  It is not a constituency, and as it
stands it should not be eligible to be a constituency.

No "organization" should have constituency status bestowed on it.
That is not what a constituency is or how a constituency should be
setup.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>