Re: [ga] Elections (Seconded)

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Roberto and all remaining assembly members,

  I believe that back in January of this year it was determined
by consensus, although not a measured one, that the DNSO
assembly members should and would have a right to have a vote
on specific issues.  As such I second Joops motion here...

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Joop,
>
> >>
> >I agree that action is already on the way in some form. But,
> >A vote from the virtual GA is a useful exercise. We haven't voted all
> that
> >often and it sets the right precedent that allows the WHOLE GA to vote
> on
> >issues that otherwise could be rammed through a physical GA.
> >It also prevents people from making the point that the whole GA didn't
> get
> >the chance to vote on the issue.
>
> For a vote, I need a motion and a second.
> But more important, I need to have a debate on the issue going on, to
> make sure that people are interested.
>
> Who wants to get the ball rolling and start proposing a text to debate?
> We can give ourselves a couple of weeks, and if there's enough interest,
>  go to a formal motion andvote.
>
> Fair enough?
>
> Regards
> Roberto
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html