ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] new constituencies


Joop,


>Since the process is now still open, we might as well help the special 
NC
>task force in their thinking:
>
>
>**********************************
>.......
>*******
>My first reaction: the DNSO was supposed to be a representative 
structure of
>all stakeholders in the DNS. Balancing  "ëffectiveness" for some 
special
>interests against "representativeness" of the body itself is not a 
proper
>exercise.
>"Effective" has different meanings for different interests.
>

The comments I delivered on Monday addressed somehow your concern, as I 
raised specifically the question on whether other groups could be 
identified that were not adequately represented in the existing 
constituencies.

Any other comments to the draft, that you want me to report?

Regards
Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>