Re[2]: [ga] GA Agenda - additional points

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Joop,

Saturday, July 08, 2000, 6:52:03 AM, you wrote:

> At 15:13 8/07/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>>Folks,
>>
>>So far I have received the following comments:
>>
>>1. recognition of an Individual DNH Constituency

>>These are my comments:
>>
>>1. I think that this is covered by point 3b) in my original message. I 
>>think that we need to revitalize the discussion about this before going 
>>to a vote an a motion to put this forward to NC. I don't feel correct to
>> call for a vote in Yokohama, only with the relaively few people 
>>attending in person, without previous thorough discussion on the list. 
>>What we can do in Yokohama is to discuss how to restart the issue, that 
>>has been dormant, with a plan to put forward a proposal over summer.
>>
> Respectfully disagree, Roberto.
> This issue has been discussed and this list has seen all the arguments (and
> the ad hominems) ad nauseam.
> I would say: let's not procrastinate on this issue any further and take it
> to a vote a.s.a.p.

On what? There is no proposal for a constituency that has been put
forward.  There is nothing to vote on.

Roberto is right, the proper plan is to decide how to return to this
issue and what concerns people have about how such a constituency
should be formed.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html