ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Yokohama - Draft Agenda


while contradictorily insisting on his IDNO membership , WXW wrote:

>
>There is no candidate constituency or constituency guidelines that
>would qualify fo recognition.
>

There is no such thing as a candidate constituency.
A constituency is a concept.

The current IDNO membership rules (defining Individual DN ownership) have
been accepted and ratified by the membership. These can form the basis of a
recognition in principle, just as the NCDNHC was recognized in principle
before it was organized.
What any grouping of Individual DN owners will need to know as part of its
bootstrapping process is the *acceptance in principle* of this eighth
constituency of the DNSO.
As we have experienced in the last nine months, the uncertainty about
acceptance has been a major factor in the difficulties that the IDNO had to
face.
A  grouping that in the end does not get representation on the NC can be
structured differently.








--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>