[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Re: electoral fraud by the ga chair
Stop avoiding the question Roberto - why did you after Joop advised
that the polling method was subject to fraud still go ahead with
it? Explain that.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> You wrote:
> >Just tell the list how many FOR and AGAINST votes you made anonymously
> >Roberto can rewrite the informal poll result.
> As I said, the most evident result of the poll was the lack of
> Only an insignificant minority cared to express their opinion, and the
> figures would not have been much different with a secure voting:
> probably with a complex procedure the figures would have been even much
> The elimination from the count of irregular expressions of opinion, even
> supposing there were any, would only have had the effect of indicating
> an even lower participation.
> Therefore, no need to do anything. If people intended to show their will
> , they would have done so.
> >Better still: The list can have another poll, this time with a proper
> >voters' roll and voter passwords, on improved rules that incorporate
> After the three months of experimentation with the new rules, we will
> have a vote (secure, this time) and we will see what people think.
> If they prefere the "old" regime, fine, the rules will be eliminated and
> I will consider myself free to go back to other occupations. If they
> prefere the "new" regime, it will be clear that all this discussion is
> in reality much ado for nothing.
> Fair enough?