[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [ga] Message from the Chair
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> The rules I support state that the GA-list is not a decision-making
> Whether the GA should or not be a decision-making body is currently
> under debate. I have the impression that under the current Bylaws very
> little decisional power is given to the GA: this is not my position, and
> if there is a consensus in the GA that we should be a decision-making
> body, the issue has to be brought forward and the scope of the decision
> of each DNSO body (NC, Constituencies, WGs, GA, ...)
This is the fundamental problem: those that already have an established
power-base via their "constituency", have no interest in seeing
that base eroded by allowing individuals meaningful decision-making
authority are deciding if individuals should be allowed such authority.
It's absurd in the extreme.
Earth is a single point of failure.