Re: Re: [ga] PAB rules v. RROR

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

your still acting like a pompous, obnoxious ass here joe !!!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>
To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
Cc: <kent@songbird.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [ga] PAB rules v. RROR


> 
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, the PAB rules are a very good starting point, IMHO.
> 
> This is the problem - and a root problem at best.  Under roberts rules -
> there are no IMHO's.  In fact as chair - you have no opinion, and that is
> a professional position.  Your sole duty is to break deadlocks and
> officiate over proceedure, not provide us with your flowery opinions.
> 
> Regards
> joe
> 
> 
>