Re: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)

[Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>]

Dearest Ken:

Please don't email me privately on these issues.  If you want to be rude -
do it in public - so we all can see how pretty you are in fact.

Regards
Joe

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Dni wrote:

> your a real obnoxious ass joe !!!
> 
> ken stubbs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>
> To: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Cc: <Harald@Alvestrand.no>; <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
> >
> > >     I mention the situation when in a debate (here ICANN/DNSO GA
> business)
> > >     a personnal attack is targetting somebody's reputation as
> > >     a woman or a mother (should be also as a men and a father,
> > >     but recent exemple on this forum was mostly aimed at women).
> > >     I do not think that this kind of "disorderly words" should
> > >     be consider as common as others, if we still claim to be humans,
> > >     with some meaning attached to it.
> >
> > Elisabeth - you finally managed to slink out of your cave for this
> > one.  Good.  Now Robert rules were writen back in 1915 - so I agree they
> > are mens rules - but as women's organizations have discovered - some
> > simple word relacement will suffice.
> >
> > Here's and example of an assembly reply which qualifies under roberts
> > rules ..
> >
> > "The lady me thinks is in desparate need of an education, she is deficient
> > in her understanding of the logic of the process."
> >
> > Now elezabeth why don't you stand up on your hind legs and provide
> > disclosure on who your censoring, why they are being censored and who is
> > responsible.  Make me proud baby.
> >
> > Regards
> > Joe Baptista
> >
> >
> >
>