[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)

To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 08:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Cc: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0001060626480.2811-100000@proxy.pccf.net>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org


Think People.

If Robert's rules are adopted, this person who says this when told lists are
running appropriately:

>> I disagree, at least for the WGs. We haven't had quite the disruption
>>that the GA has suffered. The old saw about not fixing what isn't broken,
> 
> I can change that.

will use those very rules to tie us up in endless challenges under those rules,
and effectively castrate this group by using those rules against it.

--
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)
  - From: Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>

References:
- RE: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)
  - From: Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>

Prev by Date: [ga] Greetings
Next by Date: Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings
Prev by thread: [ga] Re: ... vandalism an honorable activity? NOT!
Next by thread: RE: Robert's rules (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread