Re: [ga] Reuters: Net name dispute body gets first case

[Bob Davis <bob.davis@netzero.net>]

David and all DNSO'ers,

  Very good David!  Easy as 1, 2, 3, eh!   :)

Dnsipv6@aol.com wrote:

> Andy and everybody else,
>
>   Andy the Domain Name in question is being kept quiet for any number of
> reasons.  Not to exclude the following:
>
> 1.) WIPO and Melbourne IT doesn't want the press to chastise them
>      publicly as being the Goliath that shall squash the little shepherd.
>
> 2.) That ICANN is worried that it may not be viewed as acting in the
>      best interests of the Stakeholders at large.
>
> 3.) That the actual decision has already been made so a shame or
>      reverse name hijacking has taken place...
>
> David "Dude"Jenson
> INEGRoup-East Director
>
> In a message dated 12/6/99 2:48:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> andy@navigator.co.nz writes:
>
> << ><Quote>
>  >WIPO quoted Peter Gerrand, chief executive officer of Melbourne IT, as
>  >applauding the parties' use of the WIPO dispute resolution service.
>  >
>  >    "Hopefully, this process will be much more cost-effective and swifter
>  >than if they had resorted to the courts. As the registrar concerned,
>  >Melbourne IT will simply act upon the decision of the dispute
>  >resolution arbitrator," Gerrand said.
>  ></Quote>
>  >
>  >Cost effective, swifter, and more likely to harm due process rights....
>
>  And why is the actual domain name being kept quiet? Is that some sort of
>  method to reduce potential support for the current owner from slashdot type
>  reactions (like what happened with veronica.org).???
>
>
>
>
>
>  Andrew P. Gardner
>  Support the Cyberspace Association, the constituency of Individual Domain
>  Name Owners http://www.idno.org
>   >>

Bob Davis...

__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html