[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)



Roeland (with an extra `e` at no extra charge)

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. However I fail to see what constructive 
benefit accrues from posting here about how things will never work. If you 
think the fix is in, fine. But there is no need to remind us all the time. 

Besides, consuming bandwidth to tell us all that things will never work could 
easily be construed as a timewasting tactic getting us to `chase the chickens 
around the roost` by debating this point with you.  

Dan
Synthesis: Law & Technology
synthesis@travel-net.com
+1 613.794.5356

p.s. if I had an extra `e` Id be a Dane (hopefully a great dane)

> Please spell my name correctly, it's Roeland Meyer, extra "e", no "s".
> 
> More importantly, and the record will show, I supported Karl Auerbach as a
> nominee. I didn't say anything about a single nominee scheme. I was a hasty
> reply on my part.
> 
> The single nominee scheme is doomed to failure. Actually, ANY nominee scheme
> is doomed to failure becasue the NC can simply ignore it and emplace their
> own choice, should they deem the rest of us too stupid to know any better (a
> default case).
> 
> One reason I don't get involved with GA election issues is because they are
> pointless, just another mechanism to chase the chickens around the roost and
> keep them occupied/distracted. It works too. I'm taking notes for my "How to
> run a totalitarian regime...and live" HOW-TO.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> > idno@tallship.net
> 
> > Yes, I am of the understanding that in order to withdraw a motion one
> > would need the consent of the person seconding. I believe
> > Andy is of this
> > understanding too, and would urge him to reconsider his
> > wishes, as he has
> > garnered the support of at least 5 individuals on record by
> > my count with
> > respect to his first motion to put forth one candidate.
> >
> > Those individuals are, according to my records:
> >
> > 	1.)	Andy Gardner
> > 	2.)	Christopher Ambler
> > 	3.)	Myself (Bradley D. Thornton)
> > 	4.)	Roeland Myers
> > 	5.)	Mark Langston
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using Travel-Net Web Mail.
http://www.travel-net.com/