[ga] nomination procedures

[Mark Perkins <MarkP@spc.org.nc>]

Perhaps. If the GA ends with no power then it would be better that it was
abolished to prevent any misconception that it had a real role

Mark Perkins
Librarian (acting)
Secretariat of the Pacific Community Library
BP D5, 98848 Noumea Cedex
New Caledonia, South Pacific
Tel: 00 687 262000  Fax: 00 687 263818
email: markp@spc.org.nc / web: http://www.spc.org.nc


-----Original Message-----
From: John C Klensin [mailto:klensin@mci.net]
Sent: 16 November 1999 10:02
To: Mark Perkins
Cc: 'ga@dnso.org'
Subject: Re: [ga] nomination procedures


--On Tuesday, 16 November, 1999 08:34 +1100 Mark Perkins
<MarkP@spc.org.nc> wrote:

> As for the NC by-passing this process and setting up another
> procedure, would they not have to amend the rules effectively
> removing any democractic role for GA (in effect abolising it)?

Is that your desired outcome?