RE: [ga] List moderation

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

And one of the biggest contributors to the noise level on the GA list is the
spill-over from the bar fight on the IDNO list. I left that list because I
wanted no part of the fight. Please, don't inflict innocents with your ill
manners. Most, on the GA list, could care less about that bar-room brawl.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dnsipv6@aol.com [mailto:Dnsipv6@aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 1:03 PM
> To: william@dso.net; ga@dnso.org; DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] List moderation
>
>
>  William and everybody else,
>
>   It seems again that you WIlliam are again trying to spread more FUD
> than concentrating on gathering FACTS, which you proclaim you so
> interested in.  The fact that so few voted does say something, but
> exactly what is the real question.  Apathy perhaps, or just
> lack of time
> to keep up maybe?  These and more are possibilities.  Of course,
> you failed to point this out.  Rather you just are determined
> to spread
> FUD upon Joop in particular and the IDNO in general as the archives
> of the IDNO clearly show time and time again.  Though I do not follow
> the IDNO closely, I do know that Jeff Williams has as much as he can.
> Many of the posts that are resent to our internal list for
> our members,
> as Jeff has kindly pointed out reflect a concern amongst IDNO members
> regarding YOUR antics there while you were still subscribed.  Yet you
> still wish to retain your membership.  If you feel so
> strongly negetive
> towards the IDNO as you proclaim you do why not just resign your
> membership in protest, and be done with it?  My guess is the
> reason that
> you don't is that you have some ulterior motive.  What that
> might be I am
> quite sure I have no idea, but I am sure it is not in the interest of
> Individual Domain Owners.
>
> David "Dude" Jenson
> INEGroup-East Director
>
> In a message dated 11/12/99 5:37:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> william@dso.net
> writes:
>
> << On 12-Nov-99 Joop Teernstra wrote:
>  > At 12:29 AM 12/11/1999 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>  >>On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:17:40PM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>  >>[...]
>  >>> The re-railing proposal was ratified by 16 members, with
> 4 voting
> against.
>  >>> In the key Vote for or against direct democracy, 44
> voters participated.
>  >>[...]
>  >>> The membership stands at 160. Voting is voluntary.
>  >>
>  >>That is, the "re-railing" proposal was approved by a tenth of the
>  >>claimed membership.
>  >>
>  >
>  > And  2.5% did *not* want the organizing effort to resume.
>  >
>  > Those who have a right to vote will vote if they *want* to vote.
>  > To have a right to vote is what is important.
>  >
>
>  And the fact that so many choose not to says quite a lot.  I
> would bet there
> are
>  many on the membership roles who actually no longer even
> want to be members
> any
>  longer, but didn't bother to take the time to tell you that.
>
>  --
>  William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
>  Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
>   >>
>