[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [ga] the DNSO website



Wednesday, September 08, 1999, 11:16:14 PM, Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:59:00PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> [...]
>> 
>>> Dear Joop,
>> 
>>> you are not exactly correct :-)
>>
>>> The Board has _not_ ignored the resolution of the GA.
>>> The resolution was that the board should _concider_ your application again, 
>>> which was done. I was present , as you where.
>>
>> No, you are not correct, and Joop is.
>> 
>> The board voted to delay consideration (for the second time) till the
>> next meeting.

> Correction.  They considered it enough to delay further consideration
> until the next meeting.  You admit they voted on it -- that 
> constitutes consideration at a fairly significant level.

Kent,

If you can't see that voting to NOT consider something is equal to
practically ignoring it, may I suggest a course in rational and
logical thought?



--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/

Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
http://www.dnspolicy.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss
<IDNO MEMBER) http://www.idno.org