Re: [ga-watchdog] endorsements

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Dany Vandromme wrote:
> DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Watchdogs,
> > At the present time, Eric Dierker has only one endorsement, so according to
> > the rules he is not eligible as a candidate as the rules state that each
> > candidate must have at least 2 endorsements.  However the rules do allow for
> > self endorsement.
> > Should I point this out to him in a private mail, or just leave things as
> > they are?
> > Thank you for your advice and help
> > Glen
> > 
> > DNSO Secretariat
> > 
> > --
> > GA Watchdog Committee
> -
> I suggest to leave things as they are.

One could make an argument, in fact, that the secretariate *must* 
maintain a strictly hands-off posture towards candidates.  Any help 
given to a particular candidate is a potential problem.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
GA Watchdog Committee