DNSO Archives: [ga-udrp]

The questionnaire shall be created with an eye toward identifying potential areas for reform, including without limitation:

· forum shopping

· publication of complaints and answers

· appeals

· reverse domain name hijacking

· quality of decisions

· speed of decisions

· precedential affect of decisions within and outside of UDRP

· costs

· continuity of decisions among and within panels

· res judicata effect of decisions within and outside the UDRP

· requirements for bad faith (i.e., domain name registration and/or use)

· fairness of Provider’s supplemental rules

· ability to amend complaint

While the questionnaire will be in English, to the extent feasible, the Task Force will attempt to have it translated in other languages.

http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2001.NC-tor-UDRP-Review-Evaluation.html

It says we are not limited to this list but it would be good to be prepared to make a statement about these issues first. If we did something like each post about a paragraph worth of an answer to each issue then we would see the diversity involved in those answers and it could even lead to a poll or similar process to reach some consensus on how we want the representative from the GA to answer these quetions.

I'm open to other ideas.

[ga-udrp]

[ga-udrp] The list