Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Can you cite any examples where ICANN has started a process completely from
the bottom up before they made a decision. I would like at least three
examples as to compare results for research purposes.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>
To: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version


> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:15:15PM -0400, L Gallegos wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > You see, Dassa, it is really just one issue.  A few in a small group
> > want to make sure that they control the Internet
>
> Yes, and that small group is you and your friends: a tiny group of
> closed, private, mostly for-profit companies.  Whatever its faults,
> ICANN *in fact* is *tremendously* more representative of the interests
> of the internet population as a whole than are you and your friends.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html