Re: [ga-icann] You gotta wonder
Nope. Pretty arrogant of ICANN to ignore what the users want and for not
using a bottom up consensus in the decision making process. As I have said.
In the end the users will get what they want regardless of the hidden
agendas and the non-transparent way ICANN is operating.
Old saying. There is more than one way to skin a cat. The US Government is
only the most recent government to override what ICANN wants to do. There
will be more as it has become all too obvious that ICANN is not as good, let
alone better than what they replaced.
The thing is, they could still turn it around by just doing what they were
supposed to do. But then that requires they admit they went in some bad
directions. Couldn't possibly admit they were wrong. Isn't that right WXW?
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "NameCritic" <email@example.com>
Cc: "ga - icann" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-icann] You gotta wonder
> Hello NameCritic,
> Friday, June 29, 2001, 7:52:21 PM, NameCritic wrote:
> > It just gets more interesting. I guess ICANN is gonna have to understand
they are a technical coordination body and not going to be deciding whatever
they want to after all. What the users want the
> > users will get. Hate to be so repetitive, but ICANN had better start
listening to what the users want and forget about Pinky and the Brain.
> > http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167478.html
> Pretty arrogant of the Congress don't you think?
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <email@example.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-icann" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html