ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Once more into the breach....


Saturday, July 27, 2002, 1:27:38 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2002-07-27 14:22:35 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>>This would probably call for a major user-friendly re-design of  
>>our website, and a commitment on the part of our current  
>>leadership to pursue such an educational reform initiative.  What  
>>do you think?  Is such a project worthwhile?  Can it be  
>>accomplished?

> In my opinion, the GA should be a forum where those who have the  
> necessary understanding can discuss issues _without_ having to  
> re-iterate the basics in every posting.  It should be open to both  
> interested members of the public and the members of the  
> {DNSO,GNSO}'s constituencies.

Which is supported by the section of the ICANN Bylaws that define the
GA:

The participants in the GA should be individuals who have a knowledge
of and an interest in issues pertaining to the areas for which the
DNSO has primary responsibility


-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>