Re: [ga] Election debate?

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

CIRA is only able to hold elections because each registrant is tagged in the
registry database as being a voter/non-voter with each registration
submitted.

This was only possible because CIRA required all legacy registrants to
re-register when they assumed control of the delegation.

This was only possible because of the relatively small number of
registrations that were concerned.

I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
To: <david@farrar.com>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Election debate?


> David writes:  The main reason against the elections seems to be variants
on
> we can't make them 100% fraud free.
>
> That's just the ICANN spin... the real reason against elections is that we
> would be electing ICANN's most vocal critics.  ICANN incumbents don't want
> half the Board populated with the likes of Karl and Andy.  It's that
simple.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html