DNSO Archives: [ga-full]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:33:22 +1300
Cc: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0110261735120.66018-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net>
References: <7452072693.20011026165143@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

At 17:38 26/10/01 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

>I think it's a potentially interesting idea, but I find it unlikely that
>you'll ever get "consensus"(aka the ICANN staff and BOD) to buy into it.
>There's also a pretty significant enforcement issue. How would you propose
>to enforce judgements?

Forfeiture of a Bond in favour of the successful defendant?
We can at least *try*.

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re[3]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings
  - From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>

References:
- Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings
  - From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
- Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings
  - From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>