Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency
Here I am for any opposed.
Please feel free to post to me any way you want. I will catalog and
report the nay sayers.
Let us give it a few more days and then call a consensus!
Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > --- Sotiris Sotiropoulos <email@example.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives
> > > of the Individual Registrants
> > > > >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > >"Mission: To effect and ensure the recognition,
> > > representation, and input of
> > > > >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona
> > > fide stakeholders in the Domain
> > > > >Name System (DNS), through an established and
> > > direct voice in all ICANN policy
> > > > >formulation bodies and functions."
> So far we have:
> Myself (Sotiris Sotiropoulos)
> Joop Teernstra
> David Farrar
> Joanna Lane
> Eric Dierker
> Jason Graf
> Anybody else?
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html