[ga] Official breaking of rules

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

It goes like this;  Let us have sub-lists,  Ok that is a good idea.  Now
we will
not resolve the sub lists to the ga-full, but when we censor we will not
allow
posting to the sub-lists by those censored.  "but wait a minute doesn't
that
destroy the original intent of the the ga-full and the compromise reason
for
allowing monitoring?"  {how do we know what is filtered off the
sub-lists, 8 hrs ago it would seem everything was held in temp. This
post was sent to rules and shows up nowhere}Yes of course but Roberto
and Harald designed it and have been completely silent on the issue. To
be fair and honest they would have to step
forward and explain what they did in 1999 and the first three months of
2000. But
to do that they would impede the censorship which now obviously they
were all for.

ROBERTO REREAD YOUR POSTS TO FROOMKIN AND KARL AND SPEAK UP!
You are becoming a man without convictions to his words, by allowing
these sub
lists without protection. If you think I am mistaken please review your
March to February(2000) conversations on this list with Karl.

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Patrick and all,
>
>  Thank you for passing this along.  Was it necessary to send it twice?

>   I also did not see a ballot issued as is required by the DNSO rules
> currently in place and by the designation by the Chair and the
Secretariat.
> Is there some problem with this not being done of observed?
>
> And why am I not able to post to the ga-rules list?
>
> Alternate Chair wrote:
>
> > Members of the GA-RULES mailing list
> >
> > The proposed agenda for discussion on [ga-rules] is as follows:
> >
> > GA-RULES: To consider, build and enhance the General Assembly's
> > internal control processes including, but not limited to, its
accountability
> > structures, electoral procedures, debating processes, mailing list
rules and
> > system of management.
> >
> > (1)    Expenses and Funding.
> > Attendance at ICANN Conferences.
> > Revenue - Grants and Other Income.
> > Disbursements - who to and why?
> > DNSO Secretarial & Services.
> > Donations, use of external resources.
> >
> > (2)    Communication Technology
> > Mailing lists, IRC & teleconferencing.
> > Physical and virtual meetings.
> > Minutes and recording.
> > Polling booths and voting.
> >
> > (3)    Rules of Order, Working Groups
> > Setting up WGs & Terms of Reference.
> > Level and depth of participation.
> > Motions and discussion.
> > Reporting and consensus.
> > Complaints & lack of confidence.
> >
> > (4)    List Rules and Protocols:
> > Appointment, removal of list monitors.
> > Personal attacks, insults and slander.
> > Excessive postings (esp. without content).
> > Main list & relationship to sublists.
> > Control & consistency of sublists.
> >
> > (5)    Electoral Procedures.
> > Nomination & endorsement of candidates.
> > Selection of electoral watchdog.
> > Conducting the ballot.  Revotes.
> > Withdrawal of candidate.
> > Objections and appeals.
> > Names Council ratification.
> >
> > (6)    Conflicts, Ethics & Disclosure.
> > Definition, applicability and necessity.
> > Requirement for continuous disclosure.
> > Accountability to DNSO GA or NC.
> >
> > I would welcome feedback on any items in this agenda.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Alternate Chair
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html