Re: [ga] Appendix U
Bret and all assembly members,
Bret Fausett wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote:
> > We can either delay now while the DNSO grinds through several months of
> > inconclusive rambling, or we can delay later while the confidentiality
> > clauses tick away.
> I don't see months of rambling as an option. These contracts will be
> revised, or not, in the next week. I'd rather see the confidentiality delays
> fixed now than left in. I read in Danny's message that he fully appreciated
> the time pressures on this.
It seems obvious that Kent is trying to paint a negative view upon possibly
a review process for Appendix U concerns that is divisive in his wording.
I agree with Danny's earlier post in that seven days is not really and adequate
time for any BoD to review this information adequately. I would therefore
suggest that 30 days be set aside for a better and more comprehensive
review of these areas in the new questionable gTLD contracts/agreements.
I know our members that have been chiming in are quite concerned
regarding many aspects of these gTLD contracts.
We must all remember that if these contracts are accepted by DOC/NTIA
they will be with us for a long time and such precedence set there unto
within will set a precedent for future contracts for gTLD's.
> -- Bret
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html