ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights


In normal corporate activity, division funding comes from the top, not the
bottom. Also, only profit centers are expected to contribute revenue. I am
not aware that the DNSO has been designated a profit center. If it has, then
I have some serious reservations.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@Alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 7:32 AM
> To: babybows.com
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights
> 
> 
> It is not obvious to me either that ICANN can reasonably be 
> asked to cover 
> the cost of DNSO operation or that the DNSO can permit those 
> who refuse to 
> follow DNSO rules to continue to take part in DNSO decision 
> making, even 
> when those rules involve paying money to cover DNSO operation.
> 
> This viewpoint may be unpopular.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>