ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] On Motions


On 12:27 22/04/01, babybows.com said:
>First you bring in more members, then you work, then you motion, then you
>vote.    If you have good recommendations, suggestions, you do not need a
>motion to put them forth.

IMHO that wording and conceptions are inapproriate to the management of the
DNSO/GA ML. In order to help our Chairs to be advised on the best way to
proceed on his difficult matter:

"
I motion that the WG-Review initiated Center of Interest ML on consensus
uncovering,  ML management methods, net-democracy, transparency, etc...
is activated.with the purpose of presenting iCANN wide propositions.
"

Jefsey

PS I also propose that those interested in joining or monitoring that list 
let it
know to the GA, so we may jointly better asses the maturation of this idea.


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>