RE: [ga] percentages and numbers of cases
At 2:41 pm +0200 4/9/01, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>UDRP cases are publicly documented.
The decisions are publicly documented.
The actual complaint and response aren't.
I have seen one case where the panel changed the wording of what was
reported in the decision as the "respondent's words", to make the
respondent appear to be a "domain name warehouser".
There's absolutely nothing in the UDRP rules to stop them doing this, of
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html