Re: [ga] No Members?

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:41:40PM -0700, Bret Fausett wrote:
> > California non-profits MAY have members, but they do not have to.
> 
> That's right. The reason for the continuing debate is that, under some
> sections of California corporations law, corporations with statutory members
> are defined by whether members have certain rights -- such as whether the
> "members" can elect Directors, for example. But the creation of statutory
> members under the California law is dealt with in several different sections
> of the Code, some of which are seemingly contradictory, so it's a nuanced
> question that we're unlikely to answer here.

It is not nuanced at all.  The text is actually quite clear.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html