ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] No Members?


Hello Thomas,

Wednesday, April 04, 2001, 12:19:48 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2001-04-04 11:34:00 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:

>> What is the productive point behind your pursuing your
>> discomfort?

> ... instead of finally suing ICANN for exercise of membership rights
> and getting a clear court judgement which finishes this fruitless
> discusison once and forever?

> If some of you folks are so absolutely sure that ICANN breaks the
> "clear intent" of the California Law, and plays obvious legal "shell
> games" which only a fool can beliefe, sue them.  And don't complain.

> Whining around on mailing lists about this membership issue is
> pretty fruitless, and basically a waste of time.

"Whining" ?

It has sounded like an interesting and definitely relevant debate on
the subject.

Just because you, who is admittedly not as familiar with California
law as many of the other participants in the discussion, do not agree
with the positions being put forward, does not mean that you are
justified in painting a relevant discussion as whining.



-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>