Re: [ga] remote participation
At 2:22 pm -0500 2/17/01, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>While I support a better mechanism to include remote participation, the
>reality is that each meeting draws heavily from the local/regional
>community, and many people to make extraordinary efforts to attend and
>Let's not create a disincentive for folks to make the effort to participate
>face to face in our efforts to improve remote participation.
Let's realise, Marilyn, that very few people "make extraordinary efforts to
attend and participate".
Most of them are paid to be there.
The ones you know made "extraordinary efforts" to attend are the ones you
_don't_ see in the Business/First Class queues at the airport after the
Having a survey done at Melbourne airport would probably gather some
One advantage of remote participation is the avoidance of having to share a
venue with those creepy IP people. Saves having to steal sick-bags during
the incoming flight for use when they start speaking.
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html