RE: [ga] remote participation
Chile had a larger Latin American attendance, including drawing from the
local community. As did Cairo... but what is the argument about, Patrick? I
didn't say I disagreed, I said, let's not override the in person
There is no need to treat this as a disagreement. I'm sure you didn't mean
to do that. :-)
but, in any case, I won't be in a position to argue about it for several
days... I'm traveling and oossibly less online a bit for a few days.
From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: 'Sotiropoulos'; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: [ga] remote participation
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> While I support a better mechanism to include remote participation, the
> reality is that each meeting draws heavily from the local/regional
> community, and many people to make extraordinary efforts to attend and
Having been to many such meetings I see many of the same faces at every
I challenge you to support your assertion.
Earth is a single point of failure.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html