Re[2]: [ga] status of the GA

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Mikael,

"This goal" means that you are supporting wholesale censorship.

This is not like what Roberto and Harald so wisely did last year in
enforcing rules of civil discourse, this is wholesale censorship.

Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 11:38:59 PM, Mikael Pawlo wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>> I too have found much of the mail I receive from the GA mailinglist time
>> consuming, and yet, not productive.  I think the GA could benefit from an
>> agreed to process which can work so that anyone who wants to  make serious
>> and on topic contributions can do so, without  rants and raves.   
>> I'm perplexed about how one can help that happen, but it does seem a
>> worthwhile goal, and one which is needed before people return to
>> participate. 

> If we are a more than a few with this position it might be worthwhile to
> achieve it. I'm not against a second period of service for Mr Gaetano if
> this goal will be the driving force behind the new agenda of the chairman.
> This is, of course, if Mr Gaetano is willing to devote his talents to the
> GA once more.

> Regards,

> Mikael

> _________________________________________________________________________

>   ICQ:35638414                                mailto:mikael@pawlo.com 
>   cell phone stolen in subway                 http://www.pawlo.com/

> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html