[ga-full] RE: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - aretheyrepresented?

["!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>]

I definately will look into it.  Certainly the ripe modem sounds
acceptable.  If you have any resources you feel I should focus on to
educate myself - please advise.

Regards
Joe Baptista

On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 mike.norris@heanet.ie wrote:

> 
> > Yes, that's my concern too.  This is watered down representation and not
> > the bottom up control I'm looking for.  One thing the IPv4 owners may want
> > to consider is should the regional registries exist at all.  They have
> > served a purpose, but is that service better administered by a more
> > independent administration.  An administration controled directly by
> > majority vote of the IPv4 holders.
> 
> In my previous mail, I said I wouldn't want to force any regional model
> on anyone else, but as you've brought up yourself, I ask you once again
> to look at the European registry.  It is controlled by all those who
> receive service, in the form of address registration, from RIPE NCC.
> 
> 
> Mike Norris
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html