[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: Re: [ga] truth in labelling
>It's all very well to take responsibility, but I don't define secret
>decisions as "taking responsibility"; rather it is more like trying to
Obviously, I was not clear enough.
There was no "secret decision" by some occult power.
In absence of somebody whose task would be to "take responsibility for
the decisions", the decisions were taken by the technical staff, whose
expertise is technical, but not "legal" or "political".
Were the wrong decisions taken? Maybe. But I would not feel to throw
stones at Elisabeth (or other technical staff) for the lack of
Now the situation has changed, and you have the target for the stones:
it is me, and Harald. Please let Elisabeth and the other technical staff
do their technical work in peace.
>> Or maybe, if ever somebody will post a message of this type, it
>> be clearly indicated "off-topic" in the subject.
>I'm sorry- is management of the list and archives off topic all of a
>sudden? When did that happen? Will I be filtered for being off topic?
Not at all.
My proposal was to mark "off-topic" the few messages that were DNS-
related, like the one from John Lewis (http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga
/Arc03/msg01227.html), to make them recognizable, and allow people to
browse the archives without taking the risk of opening one of them ;>).