ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] [fwd] Re(2): [ga] Re: Discussion Draft -- ICANN Reorganization (from: andy@navigator.co.nz)

  • To: dnso abuse <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
  • Subject: [ga-abuse] [fwd] Re(2): [ga] Re: Discussion Draft -- ICANN Reorganization (from: andy@navigator.co.nz)
  • From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:35:10 +0100
  • Mail-Followup-To: dnso abuse <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga-abuse@dnso.org
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i

Alexander: I find this one entirely inappropriate.  A public remark 
may be in order.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>



----- Forwarded message from Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz> -----

From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
To: ga@dnso.org
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:06:43 -0600
Subject: Re(2): [ga] Re:  Discussion Draft -- ICANN Reorganization

At 10:48 AM +0200 3/18/02, Charles Shaban wrote:
>Well I think this is gone too far, remember that without the work of
>Mr. Cerf (and his colleague) there will not have been an Internet and
>we could not negotiate like we are doing now, you know Internet runs
>on the TCP/IP protocol which Mr. Cerf made available.

Yes. And Adolf Hitler used to be a nice young lad who did errands for his
mum, and went to church every Sunday.

Power corrupts....


-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

----- End forwarded message -----


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>