[ga-abuse] Fw: [ga] POWERFILLED DAY

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Dear List Monitor

I complain about the following posting by Eric Dierker on the grounds that it
includes a slander on my character.  In particular it contains the following
damaging statement:

> No, unequivocally Corliss is not the guy due to conflicts and
> agendas which hit the heart of the survival of ICANN.

This document is an unnecessary provocation given my previous response.  I also
find his address of my family name impolite.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss



----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: [ga] POWERFILLED DAY


> i just assumed based on the nomination situation and the fact I thought
> they would enforce that 10 nomination rule, that I was never in the
> running for chair.  I did not care, for those of you just watching it
> has been when heck of a fun ride.  One of the really cool things was the
> confidence that some of these big players put me into.
>     Wow these guys have been fighting each other for years, they have
> lost domain names and government contracts worth BBilllions. This is
> really neat because the way rules currently are I can ask you to revote
> and vote the last time for me.
>     REALLY YOU CAN REVOTE AND VOTE FOR ME.  If you take a man yelling
> and kicking and screaming and make him take the post, you have your man.
>
> If you take a man who really wants it you have OUR MAN.
>     No, unequivocally Corliss is not the guy due to conflicts and
> agendas which hit the heart of the survival of ICANN.
>
> I still have more post before I take of to the consulate in SF in the
> early am. All of you people rock.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>