[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599

To: rmeyer@mhsc.com
Subject: Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
From: "Cthulhu's Little Helper" <skritch@home.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:05:42 -0700
cc: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>, discuss@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:59:11 PDT." <005901bec1b1$73ebd4c0$ecaf6cc7@hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-discuss@dnso.org


On 28 June 1999, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> wrote:

>It's actually better than that. Treaties were ratified, last January,
>that made cross-border trademark law more effective. I leave it to the
>legal community to detail how. The situation you are worried about isn't
>as bad as you think.


Well, in this case, aren't those treaties a de facto UDR policy?

-- 
 Mark C. Langston

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- RE: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: What to do?
Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: What to do?
Prev by thread: RE: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
Next by thread: RE: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread