[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] Individual representation
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:15:04 -0700, Dave Crocker
>At 06:35 PM 6/27/99 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>>Go back to the archives Dave, Randy isn't there, on ANY of the main
>>lists. Postel's stuff was strictly IANA internal and close associates.
>>NOT part of the public process.
>This exercise has probably now been pursued far enough to underscore what
>it primarily signifies:
>Roeland, what is there that is in any way constructive in this entire
>thread concerning Randy? Note that it has nothing to do with substantive
>content under discussion and that it has consumed quite a bit of list
>bandwidth and attention.
>As I said, most who are non-constructive contributors lack adequate
I've sent a couple messages translating "Davespeak" today.
The reason is to show Dave how easily his own way of "participating"
can be turned against his own comments.
Obviously he failed to learn that lesson.
Dave's "participation" which he classifies as "constuctive" is almost
80% nothing more than the type of response I made to his previous two
posts. Normally these are in response to people on the list(s) who do
not toe the CORE line.
Dave, it is possible for "constuctive participation" to occur between
groups with opposing viewpoints and philiosophies.
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: email@example.com Fax:(209) 671-7934
The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.