DNSO Archives: [council]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Draft NC reply to the ICANN evolution committee v1

To: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
Subject: [council] Draft NC reply to the ICANN evolution committee v1
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:58:54 +0200
Cc: "NC \(list\)" <council@dnso.org>
Organization: AIM
References: <01cd01c20e31$bdafda00$6501a8c0@aim.be> <20020607164053.GA17257@yoda.does-not-exist.org>
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

Thomas,

thanks for this. Your changes reflect GA chair clarifications and one idea that we discussed on the NC call - allowing the ombudsman to invoke arbitration also.

I will incorporate these changes into the next version.

Philip

References:
- [council] Draft NC reply to the ICANN evolution committee v1
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- Re: [council] Draft NC reply to the ICANN evolution committee v1
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>