RE: [council] NC Chair Election

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

While I can appreciate that, I felt from the comments I received that
further discussion was desired.  Nevertheless, the current rules state a 6
month term so whoever is elected on the 14th will have a 6 month term.  If
we decide that the rules should be changed, we can simply apply them
prospectively.
-----Original Message-----
From: Oscar A. Robles-Garay [mailto:orobles@nic.mx]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Peter de Blanc; council@dnso.org
Cc: DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org; CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com; 'Milton
Mueller'
Subject: RE: [council] NC Chair Election


It could be difficult to manage for the person who is nominated, because 
she/he won't know when to allocate enough time to this 
chairmanship(chairpersonship?), now or after six months.

Oscar

At 08:56 PM 1/30/2002, Peter de Blanc wrote:
>How about we run the election now, as perscribed, and deal with the
>possibility of extending Philip's term separately. If we extend the
>term, the elected person can start their chairmanship
>(chairpersonship?) in six months.
>
>Peter de Blanc
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf
>Of Milton Mueller
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:11 PM
>To: council@dnso.org; CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com; pdeblanc@usvi.net
>Cc: DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org
>Subject: RE: [council] NC Chair Election
>
>
>
>I sense another subterranean proxy war.....
>
>I am favorably disposed toward this motion but am
>consulting with other constituency members.
>
>As a matter of friendly advice to the other constituencies,
>if you have someone to run as an alternative to Philip
>why not let us know now?
>
> >>> "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com> 01/30/02
> >>> 09:44AM >>>
>
>WHEREAS the current Rules of Procedure for the DNSO (version 4) adopted
>by the Names Council on 26 February 2001 (see
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020117.NCprocedures-v4.0.html),
>provide:
>
>"1. Names Council Chair
>1.1 Election.  The NC Chair will be elected by the members of the NC by
>simple majority vote and will hold office for a period of six months.
>One renewal, subject to a fresh vote, of six months will be allowed. A
>retiring Chair will not be eligible for re-election for a period of one
>year."
>
>WHEREAS, under these rules, the current NC Chair, Philip Shepard, is
>ineligible to run for re-election to the NC Chair;
>
>NOW, THEREFORE, the NC moves as follows:
>
>Solely for the purposes of the NC Chair election taking place on
>February 14, 2002, the NC moves to waive the provision of Section 1.1 of
>the Rules of Procedure for the DNSO which prohibits a retiring NC Chair
>from running for re-election for a period of one year.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter de Blanc [mailto:pdeblanc@usvi.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:21 AM
>To: 'Cade,Marilyn S - LGA'; 'Chicoine, Caroline G.'; council@dnso.org
>Cc: 'Grant Forsyth'; 'Philip Sheppard'; 'Thomas Roessler'; 'Alexander
>Svensson'
>Subject: RE: [council] NC Chair Election
>
>
>Would someone please state the "current, revised" motion so we can vote
>on it?
>
>Or are we still discussing?
>
>Peter de Blanc
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf
>Of Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:09 AM
>To: 'Chicoine, Caroline G.'; 'council@dnso.org'
>Cc: 'Grant Forsyth'; 'Philip Sheppard'; 'Thomas Roessler'; 'Alexander
>Svensson'
>Subject: RE: [council] NC Chair Election
>
>
>Caroline,
>
>Thank you for your clarification of your motion.
>
>(snip)

Top Level Domain .MX
Tel +52 (81)83875346
http://www.nic.mx

El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor no es 
apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a NIC-Mexico 
con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de datos, incluyendo el 
(los) archivo(s) anexo(s).