Re: [council] NC agenda item 3 (revised) GAC statement

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
To: <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [council] NC agenda item 3 (revised) GAC statement


> Philip:
>
> I and others in the NCDNHC could support this
> enthusiastically if point 4 were slightly modified
> as follows:
>
> OLD:
> 4. That, due to the inherent complexity, the best forum for governments to
seek solutions to the problems perceived by the GAC is the existing forum of
such expertise, namely the inter-governmental specialised UN agency, the
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
>
> NEW: (amendments in CAPS)
> 4. That, due to the inherent complexity, the best forum for governments to
seek solutions to the problems perceived by the GAC is the existing forum of
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY expertise, namely the inter-governmental specialised
UN agency, the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), COMBINED
WITH THE EXISTING FORUM FOR REPRESENTING THE INTERNET COMMUNITY IN POLICY
MAKING,
> THE DNSO.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be> 10/10/01 06:28AM >>>
> Council,
> further to the information from Caroline on WIPO and the publication of
the Board's action plan I have revised the proposed NC resolution.
>
> It is this version (v5) that I will present at tomorrow's call.
> Philip.
>
>
> Philip Sheppard
> AIM - European Brands Association
> 9  av. des Gaulois  B-1040 Brussels
> Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702
>
>