ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Oct. NC teleconference Draft Agenda Change


> I'm not sure I would agree that there has been "heated" argument. There
have
> been a few exchanges between a few GA members.  Sort of typical boredom
and
> frustration with the GA by most of the over 300 members.

Compared to many GA members' exhaustion and dissappointment
toward the ICANN process in general being engaged in their routine
job obligations, it deserves attentions.

YJ


> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJ Park [mailto:yjpark@myepark.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:18 AM
> To: council
> Subject: [council] Oct. NC teleconference Draft Agenda Change
>
>
> Council members,
>
> There have been unnecessary arguments surrounding upcoming
> NC teleconference agenda which NC can change according to the
> requests.
>
> Therefore, can we consider dismissing Agenda item 6 as we saw
> the heating discussion among GA members? Instead, the motion
> proposed by Danny Younger, GA Chair, can be discussed.
>
> Understanding that Review interim report is DNSO Review TF' one,
> Agenda item 3. NC Review interim report can be incorporated into
> Agenda item 5. NC Task Force Reports under 30 mins or so.
>
> On the other hand, it is reasonable to update ICANN's New TLD
> evaluation Task Force report after DNSO Task Force reports.
>
> YJ
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda and related documents
>
>   1. Adoption of agenda - 5 mins
>
>   2. GAC Statement on country and geographical names - need for NC
response
>      (15 minutes).
>      http://www.icann.org/committees/gac/communique-09sep01.htm
>
>   3. NC review interim report. (10 minutes)
>
>   4. NC agenda LA meeting - security issues. Decisions on possible topics
>      (30 minutes)
>
>      a) Contract Compliance-
>      Escrow of Registrar data
>      Registry back-up/ redundancy
>      Ability of Registrant to transfer to domains to Registrars who have
>      better security
>
>      b) Root Management stability
>      Process for managing/ updating zone file information in a robust
>      /secure manner
>      Management of the authoritative database such that there is full
>      redundancy
>
>      c) DNS Security
>      Increase the DNSsec implementation.
>      Sufficient geographical diversity of DNS/ redundancy.
>
>      d) Structure of LA meetings
>
>   5. Task forces (10 mins)
>      - NC structure TF status
>      - new chair of IDN TF
>      -UDRP, WhoIs, dot org
>
>   6. Request to recall GA chair (5 mins)
>
>   7. Various requests on GA mail lists (5 mins)
>
>   8. Marketing ccTLDs as generics - Vany (10 mins)
>
>   9. AOB
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>