RE: [council] A question regarding the NC Vote
I'll
let the ccTLD representatives speak for themselves, and their
constituency.
But,
Danny, I am not sure that is that clear cut, and it may be that they will agree
to remain in the NC until the creation of an SO. That would be my hope, and
should be the goal of all of us who have benefited from the input,
participation, and leadership of the ccTLD members on the NC, and the leadership
of the ccTLDS themselves throughout the process of building ICANN.
It
wouldn't be a good idea to close our relationships off from this critical group
who are supporting how individuals and businesses -- indeed most users in most
countries, use and come onto the Internet.
Our
own experience is that after all, all "brands" are local... customers, whether
they are businesses, consumers, governmental agencies, pr non profits -- like
the local brand/national brand--translate: ccTLD. Many companies make an
extra effort to ensure that they can have a ccTLD registration, even if they
have a global TLD registration. One might choose to register in primarily those
countries where one is doing business -- but my point is that the ccTLDs are an
essential part of who supports customers.... and from my perspective, I hope
they will stay in the NC until they build and launch their
SO.
We
must remember that they too, as well as the other constituencies and the GA,
will be affected by board decisions, so voting for the NC board member is
hopefully, of strong interest to them.
But
that's my personal view... and thoughts.
I just
don't think anyone should be challenging about their decisions. I am sure
they will keep the NC informed of their constituency's
decisions.
Best
regards,
Marilyn
|